# from Michael G Schwern
# on Saturday 27 September 2008 18:18:
>To make it clear, that's perltidy tweaked to my style. Eric and Ken
> can tweak it as they like, but it's a good place to start from.
I don't think I've ever gotten perltidy to do what I want. I'm also not
looking forward to having a "we needed to run perltidy" discontinuity
in `svn blame` -- does '-w' work for that or is there some way around
that?
Or maybe I just need a better tool for tracing the history -- since
refactoring into the ::Utils is going to introduce similar data loss?
BTW, the emacs/vim lines at the start of the file should be an indicator
as to how things are intended to be, but I'm not sure we ever even got
emacs to pay any attention to them, let alone textmate or notepad or
whatever.
With the perltidyrc I have thus far managed to hate least, it looks like
about a 5k patch. Which is smaller than the 7k from schwern's, so I'll
check this in while you all discuss it and then I guess mess with
actually applying some patches or something.
And first to bump the version number. At least, I think we should be
bumping it first thing post-release such that any changes will appear
in the META.yml, etc.
--Eric
--
Don't worry about what anybody else is going to do. The best way to
predict the future is to invent it.
--Alan Kay
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
