Ditto from me on 0.30_01. I installed Software::License and went ahead and tested.
Unfortunately, I didn't freeze my minicpan, so I have quite a few dists that changed version between the runs, plus some that showed up in the second run because dependencies built successfully. More importantly, there were only 2 things that failed under 0.30_01 that didn't fail (or didn't get recorded) under 0.30 and neither looks to be major modules. If the only change in 0.30_02 are in the test fiels so that it installs on a clean system without Software::License, then I think it's good to go and doesn't need another regression test. David On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]>wrote: > # from Slaven Rezic > # on Monday 15 December 2008 13:03: > > >I also had a smoke run on a FreeBSD machine running perl 5.8.8. I > >found no surprises --- test failures and successes were more-or-less > >consistent with MB 0.30 and 0.30_01, and the installed files looked > >fine. > > Thanks. I assume you noticed the Software::License problem in the tests > (fixed in 0.30_02 today) and also that not having Software::License > caused no problem during the test/installation run? > > Thanks, > Eric > -- > "Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana." > --Groucho Marx > --------------------------------------------------- > http://scratchcomputing.com > --------------------------------------------------- >
