On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > But it does mean that those wishing for the compatibility layer to allow > them to comfortably continue to exist in 1999 are out of luck.
+1 to that! -- David
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > But it does mean that those wishing for the compatibility layer to allow > them to comfortably continue to exist in 1999 are out of luck.
+1 to that! -- David