I just finished the regression test of 0.33_05 against 0.33. The list is here:
http://echo.dagolden.com/~xdg/m-b-0.33-0.33_05.txt The only things that really concern me are a few distributions that previously passed but now give 'na' grades. The all appear to be due to something like "use version 0.50; our $VERSION = ...". (Note -- what's odd is that version.pm is *installed*.) E.g.: * http://echo.dagolden.com/~xdg/m-b-0.33-0.33_05/0.33_05/na.DBIx-Tree-MaterializedPath-v0.06.i686-linux.2.6.24-16-generic.1246581100.3473.rpt * http://echo.dagolden.com/~xdg/m-b-0.33-0.33_05/0.33_05/na.EBook-Tools-0.4.5.i686-linux.2.6.24-16-generic.1246535864.13934.rpt * http://echo.dagolden.com/~xdg/m-b-0.33-0.33_05/0.33_05/na.Regexp-Common-debian-0.1.5.i686-linux.2.6.24-16-generic.1246621282.17913.rpt What's odd is that these modules passed in 0.33 through 0.33_03 and it would seem to be the addition of the new version code in 0.33_04 that causes the failure. On the one hand, these might be correct and the previous passing behavior was a bug. Or this is a regression and needs to be fixed before 0.34. I don't know which. John -- also, please see check version-AlphaBeta. "Build test" segfaults. I confirmed in a number of places, including perl 5.8.9 (with version.pm installed, as it turns out). So I'm not feeling very good about the 0.77 version.pm code and think we need to fix it or roll back to the prior bundled version. -- David
