I don't know. You can try it. if not, third-party libraries should help
________________________________
From: Some Guy <teknos...@gmail.com>
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 12:10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Issuing a client side HTTP request from a module
Wow that looks pretty straightforward. Can this be issued from the parent?
SB
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:21 PM, alin vasile <alinachegal...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> check the thread "Doing a subrequest with ap_run_sub_req" in the same list
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Some Guy <teknos...@gmail.com>
> To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, April 22, 2010 5:14:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Issuing a client side HTTP request from a module
>
> I don't really need keepalive. Just a really basic http request. However,
> this would be in a non request handler thread, so I'll have no initial
> request_rec to create a subrequest from. It would also be in the parent
> process via a monitor hook. I see the mod_proxy create_worker and
> initialize_worker, but the latter call requires a server_rec, which I won't
> have.
>
> SB
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Nick Kew <n...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 22 Apr 2010, at 08:25, Sorin Manolache wrote:
> >
> > > As Nick says, the common solution are subrequests. However, note that
> > > subrequests are not kept alive.
> >
> > Backend connections may be kept alive or closed, as detailed in
> > the mod_proxy docs!
> >
> > If you want to implement keepalive without mod_proxy, that's a lot
> > of wheel to reinvent.
> >
> > --
> > Nick Kew
> >
>
>
>
>
>
