On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 00:16, Joshua Marantz <jmara...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the quick response and the promising idea for a hack. Looking at > mod_rewrite.c this does indeed look a lot more surgical, if, perhaps, > fragile, as mod_rewrite.c doesn't expose that string-constant in any formal > interface (even as a #define in a .h). Nevertheless the solution is > easy-to-implement and easy-to-test, so...thanks!
You're welcome, Joshua. :) You could try persuading a core committer to add this as a (semi-)official extension. Nick Kew reads this list, Paul Querna often idles in #node.js at freenode.net. > I'm also still wondering if there's a good source of official documentation > for the detailed semantics of interfaces like ap_hook_translate_name. > Neither a Google Search, a stackoverflow.com search, nor the Apache > Modules<http://www.amazon.com/Apache-Modules-Book-Application-Development/dp/0132409674/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1293837117&sr=8-1>book > offer much detail. > code.google.com fares a little better but just points to 4 existing usages. This question comes up often. In my experience the online documentation is almost always outdated, incomplete or outright wrong. I don't bother looking things up, I go straight to the source. It's a kind of job security, I suppose. There are only a handful of people that truly and deeply understand Apache. We can ask any hourly rate we want!
