Joergen Haegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I assume CPAN isn't interested in non-free licenses.
> (I wouldn't use a non-free module if there are alternatives.)
I'd say we prefer stuff that is free. Having a non-free module on CPAN
is okay, as long as it is possible to distribute it over the net and
on other media. But one might ask why you want a non-free module to be
placed in a place like CPAN.
> This module is copyrighted to the company I work for, but they
> let me publish it under GPL.
What are the copyright restrictions then?
-- Johan
