>>>>> On Thu, 10 May 2001 15:05:26 +0100, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:26:21PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> > The interface choices... where would you put AnyLoader? You use it
>> > and it just works. Perhaps 'm' for 'magical'? :) I think this has
>> > befuddled other modules as well. Lingua::Romana::Perligata and Bleach
>> > are listed as having an OO interface, which doesn't seem right, but
>> > perhaps he put in O for 'other'? Perhaps 'l' for things which modify
>> > the language itself?
>>
>> I hope the authors notice wrong DSLIP statements and correct them. The
>> widget is just about 6 months old. What I need to do next is write
>> them authors about it.
> Well, the problem is there's no "Interface Style" entry that really
> matches things like AnyLoader, Lingua::Romana::Perligata, Bleach, DNA,
> etc... 'l' for 'modifies the language' would be a nice addition to
> cover such things.
Shame on me, I have looked neither at Bleach, DNA, and L:R:P would
need an s for silly? AnyLoader seems to be a pragma, it seems. A few
years agon people were so polite to create a rootlevel namespace of
Silly
Silly::
::StringMaths adpf? Do maths with letters and strings SKINGTON
We should promote that again.
>> > Oh, that's a whole 'nuther discussion! It relied on Email::Valid
>> > (which, notably, isn't in the module list) so I went by that. If I
>>
>> Very unfortunate. Email::Valid was never posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Shall we poke the author?
Nah, I hope to address something like that in the inventory letter
that I'm planning. It shall be sent to every author automatically.
>> > was to do it over again, I would have called it Mail::Find, yes. I
>> > could probably be convinced to change the name (keeping around the old
>> > for compatibility).
>>
>> I'm in favor of a rename.
> Ok, I'll do it next release.
Thanks!
--
andreas
