hi folks, not sure if my answer to Kurt's note got lost in the din. If so, please consider the following as a re-send. If it wasn't lost, then consider this to be more noise amongst the signal.
Thanks~ -dsp ### start copy ### Dear Kurt, Please see: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules/2002-02/msg00141.html Request submitted 08 Feb 02. I've emailed Tim Bunce on the subject of using DBI as a PAUSE ID and he's not yet returned my mail of 17 Feb 02 (ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Additionally, The Perl Mongers has given databuilt "dbi.pm." Anyway, if you'd be so kind as to set it up the ID per the request above, I'd be very appreciative. Thank you for your time and your assistance. Kind Regards, -dsp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ### end ### "Kurt D. Starsinic" wrote: > > On Jan 18, Philip Newton wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:27:57 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Bunce) > > wrote: > > > > > I can't remember what the "precedence to denying organizational > > > PAUSE id's" was. Can anyone else? > > > > Maybe he meant something like this: > > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08649.html ? > > > > But that was someone applying for one PAUSE ID with two names and two > > email addresses behind it. Kurt answered in > > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08948.html and said > > one email address only, please; subsequently, that person re-registered > > with one name and one address (and got the user ID CHATEAU, IIRC). > > So, David, did you ever get your organizational ID? Do you want > one? If so, send in an application and we'll hook you up. > > - Kurt
