On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Darren Duncan wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > On the other hand, I don't really think that my distribution should be > > > branded; despite anything I may have written, what I am doing is meant to > > > be a generic way of talking to databases without knowing any SQL, so > > > applications are portable, but do this more completely than existing > > > abstraction solutions do. It is not meant to be anything huge and > > > complicated like an OORDBMS emulation on top of a non-object RDBMS. > > > > Post some representative examples. (Your description was light on detail.) > > > > Tim. > > The first release of my distribution was posted to CPAN on Sunday night, > just prior to sending my original message to the modules list (as was > strongly recommended). All of the documentation that I have written to > date is in the POD for the DBIx::Portable module. It can be seen at > "http://search.cpan.org/author/DUNCAND/DBIx-Portable-0.01/Portable.pm";.
I think this needs a framework name. How about DuncanDB::* ? Tim.
