* Andreas J. Koenig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030123 08:38]:
>> For my feeling, the focus of all responses till now is that the main issue
>> about user information is that it is stored in an address book. For me, the
>> main issue is that it is easily accessible and smart.
> If an Addressbook::Entry object is not easily accessible and smart it
> is clearly not an option. Otherwise it might be good for reuse.
Conclussion: it is not an option.
>> A User::Indentity combines information from many sources for a temporal
>> existence. Calling the module anything which implies that it is persistent
>> information is wrong. Calling it anything which restricts itself to a
>> single source of data is a mistake as well.
> The name Addressbook::Entry does not necessarily imply persistency or
> single data source. It's just a metapher everybody understands.
Let's hope people understand what it is to have an identity... or create
a new identity. This is not only the area of Philosophers and Secret
Service.
--
MarkOv %-]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
drs Mark A.C.J. Overmeer MARKOV Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net
