* Andreas J. Koenig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030123 08:38]: >> For my feeling, the focus of all responses till now is that the main issue >> about user information is that it is stored in an address book. For me, the >> main issue is that it is easily accessible and smart.
> If an Addressbook::Entry object is not easily accessible and smart it > is clearly not an option. Otherwise it might be good for reuse. Conclussion: it is not an option. >> A User::Indentity combines information from many sources for a temporal >> existence. Calling the module anything which implies that it is persistent >> information is wrong. Calling it anything which restricts itself to a >> single source of data is a mistake as well. > The name Addressbook::Entry does not necessarily imply persistency or > single data source. It's just a metapher everybody understands. Let's hope people understand what it is to have an identity... or create a new identity. This is not only the area of Philosophers and Secret Service. -- MarkOv %-] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ drs Mark A.C.J. Overmeer MARKOV Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://Mark.Overmeer.net http://solutions.overmeer.net