In article <[email protected]>, Matt S Trout
<[email protected]> wrote:


> This one works in line with Net::Twitter, which is what it's most likely
> to be used with, and is written sanely (Sam works for a Shadowcat client
> and I'll be auditing his code).
> 
> As such, I've approved the registration.

However, none of those things are a recommendation for the proposed
name. I don't make nameing judgements based on the code  quality, who
is going to use it, or who the author works for.

Reply via email to