[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]]
In article <52c6cad1.5020...@faui2k3.org>, Moritz Lenz <mor...@faui2k3.org> wrote: > > As far as PAUSE is concerned, the behaviour makes sense to me and is > > only not confusing if you don't think about how Perl treats undef. > > Sorry, too many negations confuse me. Also from a Perl module author, I > kinda think that treating undef like Perl is the most intuitive appracah. It's intuitive to Perl but not to library science or databases where null and defined values are different. > > Is there a reason you don't want to give the module a version? > > Yes. Care to share what that is? I'm curious what the use patterns are for that. -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org PAUSE instructions: http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about Archives: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules Please send all messages back to modules@perl.org with no CC to me.
