On Jul 24, 9:54 am, William Dode <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24-07-2009, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > > This project isn't exactly one where many > > people are working on it, so it is not like it brings any needed > > features. > > I think there are a lot of people working on/with it that you don't see. > mod_wsgi is a critical piece of software, it serve websites ! Just me, > very little freelance, i serve 25 professional apps. For this i don't > use the releases, but an hg branch from the svn that i follow carrefuly. > One time for example i found a bug and you send me a patch that you > didn't put immediatly on the svn. So after that, i had to take care that > this patch was not erased by the svn... With an hg *private* branch > i could more easily keep my patchs. And if somebody else wanted this > patch that i tested, he could branch *my* branch. Then, when somes > people had tested this patch on their private branch you could just pull > one of them. > > Having said that, it's more important that you don't loose your time to > switch if you're not ready for that.
Aldo Graham told me he had allot of work, i can safley conclude he defenatly going to switch sooner or later now that he knows both svn and hg can coexist in google. With a bit of luck next week or so I predict a dev branch popping up in http://modwsgi.googlecode.com/hg He maybe going to say something about september but that's a quantum mechanical translation for next week --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
