Were those true residuals i.e. based on real prices, not Glass's Guide prices? The "official" book figures for Morgans bear no resemblance to what they actually fetch in the market.
Cheers, Owen. ----- Original Message ----- From: Jon Mark To: mogtalk2 Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 8:36 PM Subject: RE: [mogtalk2] Residual values Plus 8's may be, but my Roadster is 8 yrs old & would have to gain almost 9K to match what the original owner paid new with all the extra goodies he spec'd up But he took most of the £ hit when he traded in, & it's the best Mog I've had, plus it's now got 'Concours history' ;-) Regards, Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Mike Hughes [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 April 2012 16:36 To: mogtalk2 Subject: RE: [mogtalk2] Residual values Interesting Chris, I'd like to see the same comparison after 10 years, the Q5 would be worth what it weighs and the Mog would likely be worth more than it was bought for. Cheers Mike From: Chris Bailey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 April 2012 14:22 To: mogtalk2 Subject: [mogtalk2] Residual values I have just been reading a copy of the March 31st Telegraph Motoring Section. Whilst the Audi Q5 retains it's value by 72.5% over 3 years/30,000 miles, the second and fourth best were the Roadster and Plus 4 (69.6 and 68.7% respectively)! Something to cheer some of us up on a damp Monday. Chris ------------------------------------------- View posts on The Mail Archive http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ [http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/] Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=22459785&id_secret=22459785-4a39ddf8 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
