Most of us here are Maven Developers, too! :) That said, as long as we raise the major version and release maybe one beta version, I have no objections. I think we should do that on the most common plugins.
But this also means we might need to maintain two versions (3.x and 4.x compatible) at the same time for a while, although the 3.x line could be maintained by (maybe) the funds: https://github.com/support-and-care/maven-support-and-care What do the others think of this? AnotherDeveloper schrieb am Samstag, 14. Dezember 2024 um 14:42:29 UTC+1: Hi, I already had a problem using a library which requires at least Java 11. Since now Maven is moving to Java 17 <https://maven.apache.org/docs/history.html>, I suggest moving also to Java 17. They released a Release-Candidate end of last month, so I think a final version of Maven using Java 17 is imminent anyway. Any thoughts on that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/49cac187-a662-4bb1-b56f-c6b561f718d5n%40googlegroups.com.
