On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 2:42 PM 'AnotherDeveloper' via mojohaus-dev <[email protected]> wrote:
> I already had a problem using a library which requires at least Java 11. > Since now Maven is moving to Java 17, I suggest moving also to Java 17. They > released a Release-Candidate end of last month, so I think a final version of > Maven using Java 17 is imminent anyway. > > Any thoughts on that? For the foreseeable future, Maven 3 will be the predominant version. Even if it no longer is, a lot of people will still be using Maven 3 with older runtimes. I see no reason, why we should leave them behind. Jochen -- The woman was born in a full-blown thunderstorm. She probably told it to be quiet. It probably did. (Robert Jordan, Winter's heart) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/CAF8HOZ%2Bq0p1mZ8%2BrzyA83PyFD6wsAiKy--5R05e2CUvCP0A%3D%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com.
