On 2002-11-07T23:21:09, Jon Meek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Lars - As I mentioned in a posting earlier today, I did not know that a > "syslog.monitor" already existed. My "syslog.monitor" is completely > independent and is not a branch. I am sorry that I took your name and will > change it, probably to syslog2.monitor, or maybe a more creative name...
No problem. I should have checked and saw that it wasn't a branch then. Sorry 'bout that. Yeah, the two are rather completely different in scope I think. I'll give trying to make mon-syslog running again a go in the next few days. I _hope_ that it shouldn't be too much work, but those are famous last words ;-) (Jim, I also need to add the feature you requested about being able to read the local syslog socket) If anyone else, like, a real user wants to continue maintaining the code base, though, I'd be more than willing to hand it over. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Principal Squirrel SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG "If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)." -- Capt. Edward A. Murphy -- Louis Pasteur _______________________________________________ mon mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon