On 2002-11-07T23:21:09,
Jon Meek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Lars - As I mentioned in a posting earlier today, I did not know that a
> "syslog.monitor" already existed. My "syslog.monitor" is completely
> independent and is not a branch. I am sorry that I took your name and will
> change it, probably to syslog2.monitor, or maybe a more creative name...
No problem. I should have checked and saw that it wasn't a branch then. Sorry
'bout that.
Yeah, the two are rather completely different in scope I think. I'll give
trying to make mon-syslog running again a go in the next few days. I _hope_
that it shouldn't be too much work, but those are famous last words ;-)
(Jim, I also need to add the feature you requested about being able to read
the local syslog socket)
If anyone else, like, a real user wants to continue maintaining the code base,
though, I'd be more than willing to hand it over.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Br�e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Principal Squirrel
SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG
"If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)."
-- Capt. Edward A. Murphy -- Louis Pasteur
_______________________________________________
mon mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
