On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:53:05 -0400 David Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake: > > > --On Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:16:25 -0400 Jim Trocki > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Bill Chmura wrote: > > > >> Which version is recommended at this point? > > > > this should do you well: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/software/admin/mon/devel > > mon-1.1.0pre1.tar.gz > > mon-client-1.0.0pre2.tar.gz > > > > > He really should be using at least mon-1-1-0pre3 there werw a couple > significant bugs in pre1, and there have been a couple minor fixes since > then. Jim, if I tag the current code as mon-1-1-0pre4 and > mon-client-1-1-0pre3 can you put up tarballs of both of those, and maybe of > mon-contrib as well? If you don't have the time I can put up images > somewhere else. > > -David
I can attempt to get the cvs version again today. I just stopped consulting and have taken up residence in an office with a few too many windows servers - I really want to get monitoring up so I know when to reset them :) Thanks much! Bill _______________________________________________ mon mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
