Stefan Manegold wrote:
>>> Index: sql_schema.mx
>>> ===================================================================
>>> RCS file: /cvsroot/monetdb/sql/src/server/sql_schema.mx,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.122
>>> retrieving revision 1.123
>>> diff -u -d -r1.122 -r1.123
>>> --- sql_schema.mx 17 Apr 2007 12:27:07 -0000 1.122
>>> +++ sql_schema.mx 18 Apr 2007 09:16:26 -0000 1.123
>>> @@ -602,11 +602,10 @@
>>> {
>>> char *tname = qname_table(qname);
>>> sql_schema *ss = cur_schema(sql);
>>> - sql_trigger * t= NULL;
>>>
>>> if (!schema_privs(sql->role_id, ss))
>>> return sql_error(sql, 02, "DROP TRIGGER: access denied for %s
>>> to schema ;'%s'", stack_get_string(sql, "current_user"), ss->base.name);
>>> - if ((t = mvc_bind_trigger(sql, ss, tname )) == NULL)
>>> + if (mvc_bind_trigger(sql, ss, tname ) == NULL)
>>> return sql_error(sql, 02, "DROP TRIGGER: unknown trigger %s\n",
>>> tname);
>>> mvc_drop_trigger(sql, ss, tname);
>>> return stmt_none();
>
>> Why I should not use the t?
>
> well, of course you can use t, but the code above does (no longer) use t,
> and icc correctly tell us that declaring and setting a variable without
> using it does not make much sense...
>
>> I found similar examples in the code. Maybe the the t was used after.
>
> for sure, t must be used in these other cases; otherwise, icc would
> (correcly!) complain.
>
>
> since your yesterday's changes
> (removal of "mvc_drop_dependencies(sql, t->base.id);")
> t was not used any more;
> cf.
> http://monetdb.cvs.sourceforge.net/monetdb/sql/src/server/sql_schema.mx?view=log#rev1.121
> http://monetdb.cvs.sourceforge.net/monetdb/sql/src/server/sql_schema.mx?r1=1.120&r2=1.121
>
> in fact, you originally intorduced
> "mvc_drop_dependencies(sql, t->base.id);", and hence the need for t on
> Tue Oct 31 2006, cf.,
> http://monetdb.cvs.sourceforge.net/monetdb/sql/src/server/sql_schema.mx?view=log#rev1.100
> http://monetdb.cvs.sourceforge.net/monetdb/sql/src/server/sql_schema.mx?r1=1.99&r2=1.100
>
> but then apparently forgot to clean-up properly, when removing
> "mvc_drop_dependencies(sql, t->base.id);", again ...
>
>> I agree with this change I think it does affect the semantics of the
>> function.
Yes yes, I know that I just all my updates in this file. It was my
fault. Sorry again. :)
It does not affect the semantics. Sorry I forgot the *not*
Regards,
Romulo
>
> you do agree although it does affect the semantics?
>
> well, I hoped it would not change the semantics...
>
> can you explain in what way it does change the semantics?
>
> Stefan
>
>> Regards,
>> Romulo
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Monetdb-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
