> If you look at the code, the t was not used anywhere in that function. > It was assigned a value, and that's it. That's what icc warns about > (and rightly so!). Stefan's question boils down to the question, should > that t have been used after it had been assigned, i.e. did you need to > do anything with the result of the function call? If not, then the > assignment and hence the variable was superfluous.
thanks for the "translation", Sjoerd! ;-) In fact, this "picky" icc has detected a lot of real bugs in the code by complaining about unused variables, parameters and alike; that's why I asked Romulo to have a second look at the code --- no "complaint" from my side just a hint to accept and exploit the help that the compilers (and testing) provide us ... Stefan -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
