On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 06:47 -0600, Eduardo Silva wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Lauri Kasanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 May 2012 11:49:21 +0200 > > Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> From discussions with Eduardo, I believe it was Android that was broken. > > > > Curious, Google says the NDK for 2.3 came with GCC 4.4. > > > > The atomic instructions are in some cases the best way to do things, > > beating constructs such as mutexes in scalability hands down. But that's a > > separate discussion. > > > >> 4.0.4 seems pertinent - January 31, 2007 (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.0/) > >> > >> That should be tolerant enough, I doubt that there'd be reports for > >> broken platforms. > > > > I don't think the bugfix dates should be used, but the initial release - > > which for 4.0 was in 2005. In any case, I'm ok with 4.0 too. > > > > 4.0 proposed. Any comments? Anyone with an old MIPS device with only gcc > > 2.95, speak up now ;) > > > > - Lauri > > As Monkey is dependent of the Kernel, it make sense to depends of the > same requirements, per Kernel documentation: > > COMPILING the kernel: > > - Make sure you have at least gcc 3.2 available. > For more information, refer to Documentation/Changes. > > So i think that we must require minimum a gcc 3.2. If newer versions > of the compiler comes with great features we can analyze and discuss > if required,
I'd be quite happy with that! > > comments? > _______________________________________________ Monkey mailing list [email protected] http://lists.monkey-project.com/listinfo/monkey
