Hi, I still don't really understand this. For example, this line in the patch seems completely unneccesary:
libmono_la_LIBADD = \ - $(libs) + $(libs) $(GLIB_LIBS) $(GMODULE_LIBS) -ldl Since $(libs) already contains $(GLIB_LIBS) and $(GMODULE_LIBS), and $(GMODULE_LIBS) contains -ldl. Also, how should I check whenever the current mono sources have this 'bug' ? Zoltan On 10/2/05, Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:07 +0200, Zoltan Varga wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [1] was already in SVN, I checked in [2], but why is [3] required ? > > This bugreport we had in the Debian BTS [0] explains it. > I am not sure though if that still applies to Mono 1.1.9.1 > > [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=262023;archive=yes > > -- > Regards, > > Mirco 'meebey' Bauer > > PGP-Key: > http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.12 > GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- > V? PS > PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEVAwUAQ0A/wnEn5avu+UbIAQJNlgf/fLfc0epV0UGdMWfZ8/dNHvs6Y765X+Ki > BiHqGJH8qLRRWCdq0nsMDKVkF+o024+lEKulwvBDh1mzV5123hMRYdu90LFnVopQ > NZS+kCCS7sp78dnu2NEXj6MoHqWp0eUqtUAFUI6OI4Z2TPY7kvfB7Jcb+TqPCuoy > d5aphFhnGh6ZsacOlVOHXVVwgFivTiLGWXFbbbOfqGFBCHBE3gmaOYljoUPrsVpO > fTJbNQbzaTG6kPnwvuVZ61KuugEjiFnDv0J/mZg6QOrimrisUZKibH01XEMcgere > V68N6W+cYgvTZ+ubLoiFgn37zY2oRCAamCWl9Ab7R27HWtHb2ivLig== > =yamV > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list