Hey, > 1) The feature which is surely missing is a Compact Mono - equivalent > to "Compact" .NET - however with significantly reduced footprint.
What are you looking in particular for in this case? In general, the problem with the Compact Framework is that it was a subset of the framework picked a priori; Which made sense for a large group of uses, but in the embedded world where every solution is custom tuned it turned out to be problematic. Using a "linker" or a "shaper" for the class libraries is in our TODO list, but it would be good to hear what is that you had in mind. > 4) Web Services enhancments - it's really very important to get it > expanded This is a short-lived API; Am not sure that we, Novell, will ever take on building this piece as part of Mono. This is really something that third parties will have to develop Miguel _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
