Hmm... is it difficult to produce both zip and tar.gz (or.bz2) ? Atsushi Eno
Wade Berrier wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :( > > Wade > > On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 06:24 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think zip archive for text files is much worse than tgz at >> compression. How was the difference? >> >> Atsushi Eno >> >> Wade Berrier wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Several have reported that the tarballs available from >>> mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable. >>> >>> This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using. We >>> must use this limited format to support some older distros. >>> >>> To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the source >>> distribution instead. (This is created by running make dist-zip instead >>> of make dist). >>> >>> monolite and monocharger will remain in tar.gz format, but the source >>> download is in .zip format. >>> >>> Wade >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> > > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list