On Sun, 24 May 2009 09:20:07 +0100 Michael Barker <m...@middlesoft.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi, > > Actually, due to tricky dependency issue, we don't use the spec/*.xml > files in the build; we've checked in the generated source (yes it is a > hack) and make the regeneration from the spec files a manual step > (this only needs to happen when I pull in a new version of RabbitMQ). > So deleting the spec/*.xml files isn't a problem technically, but it > may mean that we do not have "all" of the source code. Don't include anything from the specification file in the .cs file though, as the documentation is non-free too. Right now the specification documentation is included into the source. > > Does Debian package Apache QPid or OpenAMQ? If so, how is it handled > those packages? They don't have such strict specification licenses, I checked the python implementation and the specification implementation bits were BSD-style license. > > Regards, > Michael Barker. > -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key ID: 0xEEF946C8 FOSS Developer mee...@meebey.net http://www.meebey.net/ PEAR Developer mee...@php.net http://pear.php.net/ Debian Developer mee...@debian.org http://www.debian.org/ _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
