On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Mirko Wischer <mirko.wisc...@sma.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > I tried to make a patch that fixes the problem - see attached file. > My example code now works without problems. I also attached > the patch to novell-mono-bugzilla, but I'm not really sure if that's > the right place. > > Bye Mirko > You don't need the second check. The assert is there to make sure we have everything in sync. I believe a nicer fix would be to do something like " if (!ins->next) { ins->next = OP_NOP; break; }" only as it would reduce the diff size and nesting levels. The best way to get the fix in is to fork mono from github and make a pull request. Reference the bug number on it and we'll take care of the rest. Thanks a lot for working on this. Rodrigo
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list