>In the case of certmgr, was there any complexity in creating the solution in MD? If it's trivial, it might be reasonable for people to just >generate them when they need them. If it's non-trivial, it might not be unreasonable to include those in the mono sources.
I beg to differ. There wasn't really any complexity there, but scaffolding takes time and energy. Proper solution file could at least be generated with make. Arthur. On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (mono) < [email protected]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:mono-devel-list- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jo Shields > > > > it's > > easier to work with a standalone MD project than the whole Mono tree, > > when doing breakpointing & object inspection > > Something I've certainly done in the past to debug mono sources, was to > create a MD/XS solution in the mono source dir locally on my system, with a > really basic console application that referenced some mono classes, so I > could then debug my console app & step through mono source in the IDE. > After doing stuff, I chose to commit mono source changes and discard the > IDE scaffolding because it was trivial. > > In the case of certmgr, was there any complexity in creating the solution > in MD? If it's trivial, it might be reasonable for people to just generate > them when they need them. If it's non-trivial, it might not be > unreasonable to include those in the mono sources. >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
