Hello Andres, >>> Despite naming conventions, libMonoPosixHelper.so is definitely a runtime >>> package, not something belonging in a -devel >> >> >> I tried to work around that with >> >> https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_checks#Suppressing_False_Positives >> but did not get it to work. >> I have now changed my spec file, so that only OpenSUSE packages will >> build mono-opt and mono-opt-devel, and all other RPM distros will just >> build a mono-opt. >> I hope this clears up some of the confusion... > > > Why not include libMonoPosixHelper in the mono-opt package, instead of > removing the mono-opt-devel package?
My packages are not split like the Xamarin packages or the Fedora packages, where you have many packages resulting from the mono src.rpm. The aim is that they should just work, and I don't want to invest maintaining them to a high standard of cleanness. Rather I have invested my time into Mono on Fedora packages, which results in the achievement that Fedora 23 will be delivered with Mono4 onboard! :) All the best, Timotheus _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
