> Can anyone shed some light? there's not that much to CodeSmith, why bother vs. building a quick parser/template/generator? you're better off getting a simple grammar(s) together with an easy-to-use parser, and just fill in the templates yourself you'll own the generators when done, and they don't take up that much extra effort vs. what they save
> I'm anticipating a lot of code-generation heavy work. shed some light on what you're trying to build. Anything that's ORM, service framework (aspx, asmx, WCF, etc.), and even UI parts should be auto-gen'd :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "anton123" <niniendowarr...@gmail.com> To: <mono-list@lists.ximian.com> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:00 PM Subject: [Mono-list] Question on Code Generation > > I'm wondering if there's a Mono substitute/counterpart to CodeSmith (or if > Mono does support CodeSmith). I'm hoping it might since I'm anticipating > a > lot of code-generation heavy work. Can anyone shed some light? > > Thank you so much! > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Question-on-Code-Generation-tp22919191p22919191.html > Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list