Hello, Guenther! This is the reply on Your message from Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 11:00:04 PM.
>> is there some difference between Portable.NET and Mono? Both provides >> .NET support, ilasm, csc, ... it's ok? GR> mono has a compiler written in c# GR> Portable.net has it written in C. GR> I also _think_ mono is more progressed, has expecially a better class lib, GR> has a better name that does not remind me and the open source developers GR> that hopefully use mono of Microsoft.net and does not invite Microsof to GR> start trouble because of the .net in the name ;-) But DotGNU is not only Portable.NET ;) It seems to be more powerfull with all it's other subprojects. Is (or will be?) there any integration proccess between Mono and DotGNU? -- With best regards, dim mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
