Hello! > What about using Rotor's implementation as documentation, instead of > reverse-engineering binary format? In any case, from the law point of view > results would be the same. One person writes documentation, another implements > this class in Mono. Except that it would be infinitely easier (and perhaps more >accurate) > for the first person to extract format from the source code instead of taking binary >apart. > Just thinking out loud.
Yes, this is the right way to go. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
