In message <[email protected]> on Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:21:07 +0000, Francis Russell <[email protected]> said:
francis> Ludovic Brenta wrote: francis> > Richard or Francis, could francis> > you please commit a suitable patch as an immediate descendant of francis> > t:debian-monotone-0.48-3 (fbfd33230edd751a48e33774dbfb4af434eb0910)? It francis> > is OK to use the branch org.debian.monotone.squeeze for that. francis> francis> I finally got around to starting to look at this, but I'm very confused francis> by the state of the repo. The 0.99.1 org.debian.monotone head also francis> appears to be in the squeeze branch. I think I may be confused as to the purpose of the different branches. francis> I'm also unsure whether the changes I made to have francis> monotone-doc recommend instead of depend on monotone were francis> removed accidentally or deliberately. That was deliberate: : ; LANG=C mtn log --from=52675ef7f1b47a94b947e9869ec308d550c43ffc --last=1 --no-graph ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Revision: 52675ef7f1b47a94b947e9869ec308d550c43ffc Parent: 6e307643afc3c6e1fbfe2eed71da333786f18015 Author: Richard Levitte <[email protected]> Date: 12/05/10 00:10:31 Branch: org.debian.monotone Changelog: Because of Debian policy (quoted below) and the fact that we make /usr/shar/doc/monotone-doc a symlink of /usr/share/doc/monotone, we must make monotone-doc depend on monotone. >From http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.3 : "/usr/share/doc/package may be a symbolic link to another directory in /usr/share/doc only if the two packages both come from the same source and the first package Depends on the second." Changes against parent 6e307643afc3c6e1fbfe2eed71da333786f18015 patched control _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
