Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [Wednesday 26 October 2005] : > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:53:17 +0200, Olivier > Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > oliv__a> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [Wednesday 26 October 2005] : > oliv__a> > > oliv__a> > richard> I just noticed that I'm currently getting a > oliv__a> > richard> disconnected graph in monotone-viz. Am I alone > oliv__a> > richard> in this? Olivier, can you remind me how to > oliv__a> > richard> generate some debugging output for you? > oliv__a> > oliv__a> Yes I've noticed this. Actually it's because the graph is no > oliv__a> more disconnected. Someone did a commit&merge on a rather old > oliv__a> revision (from august) which had effect on reconnecting what > oliv__a> was previously two components. I'm not sure what I could do > oliv__a> to "fix" the layout. > > OK, so if understand correctly, checking for other possible paths > is only done when there's a disconnection in the graph, correct?
Yes. > I understand why you don't do that for all nodes, as I can imagine > the time spent would not make it worth it. However, here's an > idea: regard apparent leaves as a possible disconnection, and check > if monotone really regards them as leaves. If not, they should be > treated as a graph disconnection. Hmm ok, I'll try that. > I also noticed that the current real leaf doesn't stay at the > bottom for the moment (because of the disconnected behavior). > While I like the more compact display, in the current situation, > it's really confusing to have the real leaf somewhere in the middle > of the graph... Monotone-viz puts leaves at the bottom of the graph. If it's in the middle, that's probably because there is a propagate from this revision to another branch. -- Olivier _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel