Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:31:07 +0200, Tom > Koelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > tkoelman> > It's yucky, but necessary when history gets rebuilt. > tkoelman> > tkoelman> I understand that. It would be very pleasant though, when > tkoelman> given a collection of private keys, the conversion process > tkoelman> would try to keep as much certificate keys original as > tkoelman> possible. > > Uhmm, do you really hold all the needed *private* keys, or just your > own? I dunno about you, but if it was my project, I wouldn't want to > have my fellow developpers' private keys.
In principle of course only my own. But if they were needed to make the conversion keep the certificate keys I think we could arrange something on the conversion flag day. Come to think of it, any way to identify the old issuer would be nice, so maybe creating some conversion private keys for the occasion would be enough already. Regards, Tom Koelman _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
