On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:19:19PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 23:29 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > > And even if I try to make it match against pattern, it fails, > > because of the way operator== works for struct prefix. Is this > > intentional? Shouldn't it also do partial matches? > > It should, and I think now it does.
Yes! It works now. :-) > As you can probably tell, this hasn't exactly had extensive testing > since being reorganized. ;-p That's OK -- we're testing it. Thanks for writing usher -- it's very useful! J. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
