Out of interest, why do you need it? You only ship the compiled EXE (ie, ARM binary code), not any IL code, so strong naming it would have little or no effect.
(yes, there are DLL's in the .app package but they are stripped down, and only have headers in - they are just used for (I think) debug and metadata) On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Ergwun <geoff.bat...@nicta.com.au> wrote: > Is there a strong named version of the monotouch.dll assembly? > I can't sign my own assembly without one. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/String-named-monotouch-assembly-tp4655948.html > Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > MonoTouch@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch -- Nic Wise t. +44 7788 592 806 | @fastchicken | http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicwise b. http://www.fastchicken.co.nz/ Earnest: Self-employed? Track your business expenses and income. http://earnestapp.com Nearest Bus: find when the next bus is coming to your stop. http://goo.gl/Vcz1p mobileAgent (for FreeAgent): get your accounts in your pocket. http://goo.gl/IuBU Trip Wallet: Keep track of your budget on the go: http://goo.gl/ePhKa London Bike App: Find the nearest Boris Bike, and get riding! http://goo.gl/Icp2 _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list MonoTouch@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
