Hey, Unless you plan on supplying the developers with the private key, there's not much point in this. MonoTouch will post-process assemblies during the linking phase to strip out excess classes/methods/fields to reduce the size of the app. During this process the signing will be invalidated anyway. There are no benefits to strong naming if you're targeting MonoTouch or Mono for Android.
Alan On 13 July 2012 14:19, Ergwun <geoff.bat...@nicta.com.au> wrote: > We're not making an app. We're making a version of our .NET library that > other developers can use in their MonoTouch project. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://monotouch.2284126.n4.nabble.com/String-named-monotouch-assembly-tp4655948p4655960.html > Sent from the MonoTouch mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > MonoTouch mailing list > MonoTouch@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch _______________________________________________ MonoTouch mailing list MonoTouch@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
