Informative writeup by Nigel Warren, John.  Thanks for passing it on. 

That spouting problem I was quering the group on a couple weeks ago is due to a busted 
tang and the cb positioned lower that it should have been.  I dove on the boat a 
couple times and positioned the cb correctly and marked the pendant.  Fixed the 
problem.  Now we'll see about fixing the board over the winter.  Any thoughts on 
fixing the tang but rather than lowering the cb to the stopper bolt, making the 
pendant carry the weight?  t

Tom Smith & Jane Van Winkle
Sandpoint, Idaho
M15-345, Chukar





-----Original Message-----
From: John Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 9:54 PM
To: For and about Montgomery Sailboats
Subject: M_Boats: Centerboard Corrosion Discussion


I recently bought a book titled "Metal Corrosion in Boats", by Nigel 
Warren.  Really a fascinating book, with all sorts of hints and 
discussion about how to best arrange all your metal components on a boat 
and how to manage the effects of corrosion above and below the water.

Anyway, there's a section in the Chapter "Underwater Problem Areas", 
that should be of interest to all Montgomery owners, especially those 
with metal centerboards.  I have typed this section in for you.  There 
are other sections that deal with topics near and dear to Montgomery 
owners, but I'll start with this one.

John Fleming
M-17:  "Star Cross'd

----

Centreboards (Nigel's a Brit)
Most centreboards are of mild steel, sometimes galvanized sometimes not. 
That in itself does not produce special problems but the pivot bolt and 
the hoisting gear often enhance corrosion.  The bearing areas in way of 
both the pivot bolt and the lifting tackle are especially prone to a 
vigorous corrosion.  The actual surfaces in contact rub together and are 
immersed in salt water.  Any galvanizing or other protective coating 
soon rubs off exposing the bare steel edge. The hole in the centreplate 
then enlarges quickly. The lifting tackle pin is necessarily close to 
the edge of the plate and eventually after a few seasons can pull 
through the edge releasing the centreplate. This process will happen 
even with compatible metals - in most cases a galvanized shackle pin in 
a steel centreboard - but if a stainless or bronze shackle is used the 
rate of corrosion of the hole is many times faster because of galvanic 
effects.

With a mild steel centreboard there is no long-lasting solution to this 
problem except to use compatible materials, i.e. a galvanized shackle on 
the end of the lifting wire and a galvanized pivot bolt, and then to 
accept that steady wear will take place. Each year the items should be 
inspected and replaced when necessary.

In the case of the lifting tackle at least the wear of the plate itself 
can easily be avoided by fitting a pair of mild steel straps and having 
a replaceable pin. With more difficulty, the hole for the pivot bolt can 
be fitted with a removable steel bush[ing]. Then at least all the 
wearing parts are easily replaced.

Obviously the thicker the bolt and the pin the longer their life; many 
boats with centreboards are fitted with pathetically thin pivot bolts 
which while being quite strong enough when new can tolerate very little 
corrosion.  [How true is this for Montgomery's?  I wonder.]

The lifting wire itself is a problem.  Constantly wetted, neither 
galvanized nor stainless wire is likely to last long. Stainless wire 
will give a short life underwater because of pitting, and if a 
coppersleeved Talurit splice is fitted this will corrode preferentially. 
Polyester (Terylene or Dacron) rope is one solution, though with a chafe 
problem, but galvanized chain is better.  The lowest link will take the 
wear but if an overlong piece of chain is fitted in the first place it 
can be cut off in due course and the next link up used instead. The 
galvanizing will last only a few years so replacement of the chain must 
be considered as a matter of course.

[My Montgomery has a little wire rope pigtail attached to the board, and 
then a polyester line going to the cockpit.  I guess he's saying I'll 
have to check it every so often.]

A complete long-lasting solution to the wear problem at the pivot and 
lifting pin on a steel centreplate is elusive. Obviously a longer life 
would ensue if the wearing areas were of a hard and corrosion resistant 
metal: this suggests stainless steel. The pitting problem would be 
reduced by the cathodic protection given by the steel plate. So, at the 
pivot, one would end up with a stainless bush fixed to the plate and 
with a stainless steel bolt, making sure that Type 316 stainless steel 
was used. The bush could be rivetted, bolted or even welded in place. 
Similarly the lifting point could be bushed, or stainless steel tangs 
could be fitted. From there a stainless shackle would lead to a 
polyester lifting rope.

[I believe that the Montgomery's more or less follow this advice, except 
for the stainless bushing at the centerboard pivot.  He seems to say 
that the pivot bolt must be pulled and inspected on a regular basis, and 
if any significant pitting has occurred, it must be replaced.  Also, it 
implies that even though the centerboard is painted to control rust, 
there must be metal-to metal contact between the cenboard and the pivot 
pin.]

Of course a centreboard of zinc-free copper alloy would solve all the 
problems because the attachments could then be of the same 
corrosion-free alloys.  Suitable metals that come to mind are copper, 
gunmetal [a bronze (88% copper plus tin)] and copper-nickel. Copper 
alloys are much the same density or a little heavier than steel.  A 
bonus would be that no antifouling would be necessary. The lifting wire 
could be of Monel (which is available, though at a price). Stainless 
steel for the centreplate could also be considered (again Type 316) with 
sacrificial anodes.

[The new M23 Bob Eeg is making has a centerboard of silicon bronze, 
though he doesn't say here whether the pivot bolt is still allowed to be 
  stainless.]

Usually cost rules out such materials and mild steel is the only 
practical choice; but to avoid disaster it is wise to consider carefully 
the pivot and lifting arrangements.

----------------



_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats




This message was scanned for viruses.




_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

Reply via email to