Dear soon-to-be Montgomery owner.  
Run, do not walk.  Get this M-15 I you really do want it.  This boat
looks very nice.  You will hate yourself if you miss getting this one.
I would buy it if I was not in the middle of restoring my old hull # 189
with lots more years on it.  I have spent a grand just restoring the
neglected trailer.  My Monty 15 was cheap but the costs of restoring
have passed $4450.  Best of luck beating out the other buyers out there
looking at this same ad.  ----L.  In the Sacramento Valley.

-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ion.com] On Behalf Of W David Scobie
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: M_Boats: looking for hull #288's history


montgomery owners:
   
  my name is dave scobie and i'm looking at joining your club by
purchasing an M15.  i've located a boat in the seattle area -  hull
#288.
   
  i've been looking into the history of this boat, as she has been
around for 22 years, and see that there are two hulls out there with the
same number.  so someone has a 'fake' montgomery ... or there is a
record keeping issue.
   
  the boat is described and pictured at the following www address:
   
  http://home.wavecable.com/~ds.seibold/sailboat/sailboat.htm 
   
   
  you will notice there is a picture of "Pato's" HIN number (scroll the
the bottom of the www page listed above): MMP2880684.  besides this
number not having the correct number of digits, she is the same hull
number as Rich Cottrell's M15 "Really".
   
  thoughts on this situation are appreciated.
   
  happy sailing.
   
   
  dave scobie
  *possible M15 owner*

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

Reply via email to