Re: Lead versus Steel Ballast - 
If I may.... gotta love the internet - you can just butt in anytime you  want!
 
I drilled the keelson of my boat for a transducer about 11 years ago. Took  
me two if not 2.5 bimetal good quality hole saws to get thru the d#mn boat! 
Yes,  I found the 'dreaded' steel. I thought 'darn this is less than perfect' 
and 
 proceeded to install the transducer fitting using 3M 5200 making sure  as 
always that a complete seal was made inside the boat and outside of  course.
 
This boat is dry sailed, 1980 model high on deferred maintenance until  this 
last year (lack of use last ten years). I have experience ZERO problems  with 
the centerboard and or keel. About 15 years ago I replaced the board  pennant 
for the previous owner and no issues.
I would like to spend some quality time lying on my back beneath the  trunk - 
remove the board - clean and retape the edges as is well documented  
graphically by the Wrinkleboat wrepair wizard - Sean Mulligan.
This exercise in goobies falling into my eyes and other head parts is  
preventative and for speed enhancements it would appear. No excess rust, no  
stuck 
board, no viagra-like swelling of the keel area. And all this in a 27 year  old 
boat with steel punch drops for ballast.
 
I guess I go off on this in a defensive stance - the earlier boats do not  
deserve the stigma of Bad Boat - steel ballast - if they are managed properly.  
Shoot if you want a no maint. boat get a Sunfish. Little headroom in mine but  
almost 0 maint.
 
Lead is nice, but if one discounts all the 'early' - read "steel" boats you  
are very limited and have few and far more expensive choices available. IMnHO 
I  seriously favor the original deck, interior and toerail. I looked long and  
hard to find my boat, and had the choice of many (ex Marine Idiot  
Professional)  (MIP I believe coined by USSailing in the  80's)  Marine 
Industry 
Professional - to prevent or separate amateur  sail racers from professional 
sail 
racers. My choice was based on the: build  quality at time of 
manufacture/interior layout-galley type/aluminum toerail.  From about 1970 to 
the day Jerry quit 
building Montgomery's my family was a  dealer for his boats, I knew and REALLY 
liked the early models. PS I think --  virtually all the 23's are steel -- 
ones that have had their ballast replace  spent YEARs in the water - 15's and 
most 17's are not subjected to this  immersion/galvanic action scenario, they 
are THE BEST TRAILERABLE SAILBOATS  under 20 feet available! They are usually 
on 
a trailer - nice and dry, no  blisters, bottompaint, galvanic issues, etc! 
Don't Worry - Be Happy - Go sailing.
 
GO
M-17 #316a a "Steelie" and darn proud of it! 
 
If the boat has been well cared for and the board is working when it has  
been dry  (out of the water 24/7) for at least 30 days +- the wet boats  need 
additional evaluation by PROFESSIONALS in the GRP industry. I cannot fathom  a 
party buying a boat on a trailer and not checking the CB operation - Caveat  
Emptor!



************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. 
 Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

Reply via email to