Hi- I thought I'd pipe in when time allows.  I can't believe how busy I am 
for an old, semi- retired guy  I think that means that I seldom get paid for 
most of the things I do!

jerry
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dick Straubel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "For and about Montgomery Sailboats" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 wing keel -- sacrilege?


Would increase the draft by the thickness of the metal plate. When heeled, 
the wing might go down deeper as it tilts, but not significant and would not 
increase draft more than the thickness of the plate when not heeled. The 
plate could actually be quite thin, and weight or original board could be 
replaced by pouring a lead/resin gruel down into the trunk from above. The 
trick would be to design the rake of the wing blades and determine the 
position of the wing plate fore and aft on the keel to achieve the best helm 
balance. I believe the point of raking/sweeping the wings is to adjust the 
center of lateral resistance aft as the boat heels so the helms stays close 
to balanced.

Was hoping Jerry would jump in on this idea -- but then again, he is apt to 
feel some of that purist indignity at the thought of a wing keel on a Monty 
and I am afraid of what he might say.

BTW -- am about to order a new set of tan bark sails from Porpoise Sailing 
in Sarasota. Will have a 150% 5 oz. jenny on a furler and a 6 oz. main with 
two full battens and two 3/4 battens. I keep wearing out sails -- the heavy 
fabric in these should last longer than I will. Wayne Stevens at Porpoise 
has single handed all over the world and is a solid, salty citizen.

--- On Sat, 9/20/08, Joe Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Joe Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 wing keel -- sacrilege?
To: "For and about Montgomery Sailboats" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, September 20, 2008, 9:40 AM

If a wing keel was used to replace the trunk/centerboard, what would that do
to the draft??
JoeSeafrog M-17
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "For and about Montgomery Sailboats"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 wing keel -- sacrilege?


Ronnie,  That sounds like what I saw, it came out right after the US lost
the Americas cup to Australia whatever year that was.  Everything was wing
keels for awhile.  Glad to hear yours performs so well, wish I had bought
one back then instead of the Catalina 25 I bought.  Anyway I am happy with
my swing keel (centerboard) M17 but if I had a choice I would go for the
fixed or wing keel.  I think I'll take our earthquakes over your hurricanes
any day.
Ken from California
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ronnie Keeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "For and about Montgomery Sailboats"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 wing keel -- sacrilege?



Ken,

I have 1974 M17 #14 which has a fin keel with a rather long, wide, square
sectioned bulb that might be thought of as a wing.  It draws 39" and when
Griselda belonged to my brother, we could outrun any of the keel/cb M17s on
Lake travis.  Griselda is now mine after sitting neglected in my brothers
yard for 15 years.  She is on her trailer in my yard getting a complete
refit and I hope to have her back in the water soon.

I had a bit of a delay in the work on her due to Hurricane Ike passing
directly over us with 75 mph winds.  I tied her down to house trailer anchor
augers and she rode it out fine with only a shredded sunbrella cover to show
for the storm.  I am glad she was not in the water because I had 5 foot
breaking waves over the dock and boathouse.  When we get electric power back
to run the sander and spray gun and I have repaired some damage to the house
and dock, work will continue.

Ron
M17 #14 (fin keel)
Griselda



> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [email protected]> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008
> 08:13:53 -0700> Subject: Re: M_Boats: M17 wing keel -- sacrilege?>
> I
> remember looking at winged-keel version that Montgomery was building in
>
> the 70's I think. Anyone out there got one?> Ken from
California> -----
> Original Message ----- > From: "Dick Straubel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To:
> <[email protected]>> Sent: Friday, September
19, 2008
> 5:23 AM> Subject: M_Boats: M17 wing keel -- sacrilege?> > >
Hesitate to
> even mention this to the Montgomery faithful -- don't want to >
trigger a
> wave of purist outrage -- but has anyone considered a wing keel on > a
> Montgomery 17? Have mine in salt water which can cause problems with the
>
> CB trunk. Maybe a stainless plate about the same weight as the CB could be
>  > bolted up against the bottom of the keel. Could extend out to the
sides
> as > does a wing keel. Would achieve same weight, same shallow draft,
and
> solve > some CB problems. Probably not the same windward performance,
but
> might be a > reasonable trade off.> > Dick Straubel> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________>
> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats>
> >
>  > _______________________________________________>
> http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats
_________________________________________________________________
See how Windows Mobile brings your life together—at home, work, or on the
go.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093182mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats



_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats


_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats




_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1680 - Release Date: 9/19/2008 
8:25 AM



_______________________________________________
http://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/montgomery_boats

Reply via email to