On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:31:26PM +1200, Sam Vilain wrote: > I would suggest that as a better distinction - if the *API* is > fundamentally tied to Moose, then delivering to a MooseX:: namespace is > much more acceptable. If the API is not Moose-specific, then it should > not be.
I disagree here - this would imply that anything written as a role could go under MooseX (since roles don't exist outside of Moose), and that's pretty wrong in my opinion. I pretty much agree with Dave here (and I think that a reasonable low bar (necessary, but not sufficient) is that it explicitly touches a metaclass somewhere, although I haven't put very much thought into whether that's reasonable or not). -doy
