Yeah, when you've got a couple scripts and one aspect, it's best to throw up a simple test page that isolates this behavior.
And then, if that fixes it, you know it's possibly the amalgam of other things going on, much like I'm dealing with IE6. Simple example works great! Comples example, not so much. On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, "Iván N Paz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Understood.... > > Well.. since you are using opensource code, you could also split appart and > isolate the offending code, and make an example... maybe in the process you > find the answer, or if not, just post a link to that part, so someone can > take a look at it.... > > No one is going to bother you for putting up a demo online with content not > found in the official application.... :-) > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Itt is part of a private development project, i will need to get > > permission before releasing a URL.....thank you for your help so far. > > > On Oct 8, 4:11 pm, "Iván N Paz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well... after clearing out versions and everything.... Do you have a > > > live-url where we can check what you are doing?????? > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am not sure, But i think both the examples that I am using at the > > > > one that VideoBox uses is running off of MooTools 1.11. There > > > > shouldn't be a conflict of compatibility. > > -- > ◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦◦www.ivanicus.com
