Philip, Oh.. right. Can't understand it too. But what I can see is that there's a difference in jquery and mootools in both cases. Looks like it's related to the benchmark itself. Maybe on a previous version of jsperf they used to benchmark in a different way.
-- Fábio Miranda Costa Front-end @ Yipit.com *twitter:* @fabiomiranda *github:* fabiomcosta On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Philip Thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > I thought Slick was introduced in 1.3, so it seems like there shouldn't be > much of a difference between 1.3 and 1.4. There's 1.5 million compared to > 80k... that's significant. Is there something I'm missing? > > ~Philip > > > 2012/3/9 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> > > COOL! >> >> Looks like they are getting some nice optimizations by caching the checks >> for if the current selector is supported by the browser's querySelectorAll >> function.Wow the difference is impressive! >> >> Thank you Philip, this may help on improving Slick, Mootool's selector >> engine :) >> >> -- >> Fábio Miranda Costa >> Front-end @ Yipit.com >> *twitter:* @fabiomiranda >> *github:* fabiomcosta >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Philip Thompson >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Why the massive discrepancy between the two? >>> >>> MT 1.3.2, Dojo 1.6.1, jQ 1.6.2 >>> http://jsperf.com/jquery-vs-dojo-vs-mootools-dom/30 >>> >>> MT 1.4, Dojo 1.7, jQ 1.7 >>> http://jsperf.com/jquery-vs-dojo-vs-mootools-dom/38 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ~Philip >>> >> >> > -- > http://lonestarlightandsound.com/ >
