So basically that means the jsperf can't be trusted at all. =\ Heh ~Philip
2012/3/9 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> > Philip, > > Oh.. right. > Can't understand it too. But what I can see is that there's a difference > in jquery and mootools in both cases. Looks like it's related to the > benchmark itself. Maybe on a previous version of jsperf they used to > benchmark in a different way. > > -- > Fábio Miranda Costa > Front-end @ Yipit.com > *twitter:* @fabiomiranda > *github:* fabiomcosta > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Philip Thompson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I thought Slick was introduced in 1.3, so it seems like there shouldn't >> be much of a difference between 1.3 and 1.4. There's 1.5 million compared >> to 80k... that's significant. Is there something I'm missing? >> >> ~Philip >> >> >> 2012/3/9 Fábio M. Costa <[email protected]> >> >> COOL! >>> >>> Looks like they are getting some nice optimizations by caching the >>> checks for if the current selector is supported by the browser's >>> querySelectorAll function.Wow the difference is impressive! >>> >>> Thank you Philip, this may help on improving Slick, Mootool's selector >>> engine :) >>> >>> -- >>> Fábio Miranda Costa >>> Front-end @ Yipit.com >>> *twitter:* @fabiomiranda >>> *github:* fabiomcosta >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Philip Thompson >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Why the massive discrepancy between the two? >>>> >>>> MT 1.3.2, Dojo 1.6.1, jQ 1.6.2 >>>> http://jsperf.com/jquery-vs-dojo-vs-mootools-dom/30 >>>> >>>> MT 1.4, Dojo 1.7, jQ 1.7 >>>> http://jsperf.com/jquery-vs-dojo-vs-mootools-dom/38 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> ~Philip >>>> >>> >>> >> -- >> http://lonestarlightandsound.com/ >> > >
