I have to agree with David, Ralph, Henry and others... there are huge gaps
in this list, which are filled by some 2nd and even 3rd rate films.
Apparently the authors decided to try and come up with a list that was all
things to all people, and ended up with a mongrel that may be "interesting"
but which don't really hunt as the "Best 100 films of All Time". Of course, no
one would ever agree on the exact makeup of such a list, that's far too
personal, but even a first year college film student could come up with a better
overall selection than this. A pitiful effort, really.
-- JR
|
- Re: [MOPO] TIME MAGAZINE'S PICKS OF THE TOP 100 FILMS ... JRS
- Re: [MOPO] TIME MAGAZINE'S PICKS OF THE TOP 100 F... Saul H. Chapman PhD
- Re: [MOPO] TIME MAGAZINE'S PICKS OF THE TOP 100 F... Kirby McDaniel
- Re: [MOPO] TIME MAGAZINE'S PICKS OF THE TOP 100 F... Toochis Morin