Violating my normal procedures, I popped for first run tickets tonight to
WAR OF THE WORLDS. My reaction? Well, it's pretty strange... depending on what
specific scene or sequence, I can completely agree with *everything* that has
been said on this list about this picture -- both the positive and the
negative!
Which is to say:
I thought the first two-thirds of the picture a flamin' masterpiece. Just
about everyone over 11 years old should see it. It is dynamite film-making and
creates visual and emotional effects I don't think any other film has
ever achieved to this extent. Extremely well done all around (provided
you suspend your disbelief and go along with the basic idea. If you're going
to nit pick the internal logic of what's going on, you might as
well save your money and turn back at the theater door, Roger Ebert).
And I'm not just talking about the effects. I think the acting and writing
in the first two-thirds are fine, equal to any film around this
year in or out of the sci-fi genre.
Then comes the last third, and while it is still great, a
few things do start to go a little awry. But you know, now that I think
back on when I read the original novel by H.G. Wells (written in 1898) I do
recall that the same thing happened when I got to the last third of the book.
It became a bit disjointed, a little preachy, slightly distracting and
seemed to break the flow a bit, even though I could see that it was necessary to
the continuation of the plot. Even so, somehow I just didn't like that part
of the book as much as the first two thirds. Same thing happens for me in
Spielberg's film (which holds remarkably true to the book, even though the
time-frame has been moved up 100 years and relocated from Victorian England to
modern day New Jersey and the single-man protagonist is now joined in his
perilous flight by a teenaged son and 12-year old daughter).
For me, those scenes in the last basement went on too long. They got
pretty hard to swallow at some points, even with one's disbelief fully
suspended. And Cruise's acting, which was fine at first, does finally crack
under the strain and he does deliver some truly overdone moments. The rest
of the cast continues to hold up -- and in all fairness, Cruise is carrying the
main load for almost 2 hours -- it is his face we see so very much of the time.
But still, one can only do so much with wide-eyed terror-stricken panic. At
some point you've got to start mixing in some grim determination... some
calculation and resolve... or even just plain fatigue. Something more. If you
don't, you are in danger of becoming a self-caricature. By the end of the film,
Cruise gets perilously close to this a couple of times (but just a couple). I
blame Spielberg for not catching this and reigning him in or helping him
expand the psychological and emotional range a bit. That's his
responsibility as director and although he has done a magnificent job
overall, I think he slipped up in this area just a touch.
The ending? Brilliant --and perfectly in line with Well's original -- and
then blemished (only a little) because Spielberg just couldn't
resist one final splash of pixie dust.
Whew... it's hard to write a review without giving away too much. What the
heck... if you don't know by now : Its about a really, truly, extremely bad
alien invasion in which all of humanity is nearly wiped out. Hey, go see this
thing on the big screen with the big sound and all... it's the best show in
town!
--JR
|
- [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War of the Worlds JR
- Re: [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War of the World... Kirby McDaniel
- Re: [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War of the W... Craig Miller
- [MOPO] More 2 bits worth of War of the ... Glenn Taranto
- Re: [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War of the W... JR
- [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War of the W... Glenn Taranto
- Re: [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War ... JR
- Re: [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War ... Richard Halegua Comic Art
- [MOPO] Pt. 4, War of the W... David Kusumoto
- Re: [MOPO] attn: Scott BUR... Tom Martin
- Re: [MOPO] 2 bits worth of War of the World... Toochis Morin