David wrote that "images are generally discouraged in MoPo posts, even if they're web-hosted on another site." As long as a LINK to an image is posted and NOT the image, its hunky-dory with me and the listserv. This is an ultra-rare occasion when I must say David is "incorrect"--sorry David!!
For those who don't want to see such linked images, you should adjust your e-mail program to not display the URL's. I don't see what the fuss is all about in the first place. Scott MoPo List Owner -----Original Message----- From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu]on Behalf Of David Kusumoto Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:08 PM To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Subject: [MOPO] OT: images in MoPo posts. Those images aren't attachments, Kirby. They're web-hosted. This is why, for example, an ad for Profiles in History posted to MoPo arrives in your box with HTML graphics and images -- but NOT as an attachment. Attachments have to be opened and the MoPo system rejects them. But web-hosted images come through the MoPo system as code and unless a person posts super big files with a million HTML web-hosted links, they're not supposed to slow down your system or take up a lot of bandwidth at all. It is true, though, that images are generally discouraged in MoPo posts, even if they're web-hosted on another site. -kuz. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- CC: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU From: ki...@movieart.net To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT: Speaking of Stephen Fishler... Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:01:33 -0500 Is this going to start a trend of people posting their images? It might as well be Facebook. And since WHEN did these tiny urls start rendering the image. Have I missed something here, or has AMERICAN.EDU updated something? I know we are not supposed to post attachments. What's going on here? Kirby On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:27 PM, David Kusumoto wrote: A MoPo pal privately (and jokingly) asked me last night, "so who's the ugly guy having dinner with Liza in the 4th picture?" With a straight face, I admitted it was me. Those pictures were taken about 2 years ago. However, in my defense, I noted that with the mastery of CGI, I can be cleaned up -- as is sometimes necessary in the field of news and public relations; thus, for those "just getting to know me," who've never met me in person (despite being a MoPo member for years) -- I submit a "reasonable facsimilie" of yours truly, an older pix taken for professional reasons -- (but stripped of the "kidding on the square" caption beneath it). Hey man, anything to reduce my "ass***e score" among my detractors. I'm aware most will still mutter, "now that stuck-up clown is torturing us with a picture of himself." Trust me when I say I do not look like the imposter below; vaguely similar, but with a lot less hair, a lot more gray and a lot more pickled; after all, I was born in occupied Tokyo during the Eisenhower years, so lay off. :-( P.S. -- I will admit, though, that I did have a hilarious bit role in film that people keep bugging me about. Remember that goofy Japanese guy who tries to hit on Frances McDormand in the restaurant scene in "Fargo?" Yeah, that was me. So there. http://tinyurl.com/d6g7t3 -----Original Message----- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:45:35 -0700 From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com Subject: OT: Speaking of Stephen Fishler... To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Freeman: OK, I'm busted. Liza felt sorry for me going alone, so after 30-minutes of begging and groveling, making a total Asian spectacle of myself -- Liza agreed to stand-in as my "wife" -- at Bruce's poster sale back in 1998. Below are more recent pictures of Liza taken during our last visit to New York. The woman below is not only Liza Minnelli -- she's also, when the need arises -- my "wife." I have a receipt to prove it. Keeping up appearances is expensive, man. But I don't mess around. -d. http://tinyurl.com/c7olph ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: flixs...@aol.com Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:12:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [MOPO] Speaking of Stephen Fishler... To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com; mopo-l@listserv.american.edu What was Liza Minnelli doing there? In a message dated 3/15/2009 11:59:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, davidmkusum...@hotmail.com writes: David I have always meant to apologize for hassling your wife back then at that Comic-Con in the 1970s! Bruce -- it couldn't have been you in the 1970s at Comic-Con who hit on my girlfriend-who-later-became-my-wife. She remembers the creep being definitely fair-haired and geeky. And though you're obviously no George Clooney -- my wife doesn't consider you a geek, as is evident in the two pics she prodded me to share (see below) that were taken with you both at your L.A. sale. Meanwhile, I have to say that while showroom auctions are prohibitively expensive -- (which explains the high buyer and seller premiums other auctions charge) -- there's a wistfulness I feel about those sales of the past. That sale of yours in L.A. in that massive building was something, with all the lots displayed in floor-to-ceiling rows around the room -- and what was a "first" for an "auction house" at the time -- you had lots of food stored in big coolers in the back for everyone to help themselves. My recollection of the news story I wrote -- was you had several hundred lots and only about 4-5 passes. And the happiest guy in the room (besides the winning bidders) -- was a fellow in his late 30s named Marty Saltzman, who agreed to be interviewed and proudly revealed he was the consignor of more than half of the lots. That kind of openness among consignors and bidders -- with media present -- will likely never happen again. I think the only reason why normally hide-bound people would reveal themselves in this way -- was because they were not only happy, they were ecstatic -- and the noisy party-type atmosphere in the showroom helped -- (a big contrast to more stoic affairs held elsewhere). Whatta day that as... -d. http://tinyurl.com/cjsft3 -----Original Message----- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:26:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [MOPO] Speaking of Stephen Fishler... From: brucehershen...@gmail.com To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com CC: MoPo-L@listserv.american.edu David I have always meant to apologize for hassling your wife back then at that Comic-Con in the 1970s! Seriously though, I really have to admire Steve Fishler. Back at the time of that auction, Steve and around a dozen other guys were advertising hot and heavy that each one of them paid the "most" for top quality posters. Well, I knew when I got these two incredible posters (never before auctioned, excellent unrestored condition, and straight from a man who had owned them for 50 years) that THIS would be the ultimate test of who was the real deal, and who was "all talk". My auctions have always been cash only, with no trades, no 6 months zero interest, no pretend sales, etc. I made it clear before the auction that the high bidder on either of these two posters would have to pay in full within 30 days of the auction date (and only in the world of collectibles where almost all the top players for the most expensive posters are "collectibles rich, but cash broke" could these be considered onerous terms). Well the auction came, and not only did Fishler buy BOTH of these, but none of the other "we pay most" guys even bid! And of course I would have gone to my grave without revealing who bought these except that Steve himself revealed that he was the buyer. The collectibles world is filled with lots of big talkers, and huge sales that never really happened, but these were two sales that did. Bruce On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 5:29 PM, David Kusumoto <davidmkusum...@hotmail.com> wrote: ** I confess when my good-looking girlfriend (who's now my wife) and I first walked into Comic-Con in the 1970s (which was then held in the smallish El Cortez Hotel and later the Civic Center here in San Diego) -- we were taken aback by the geek factor, people dressed up in costumes and reciting every line in Star Trek, going over plot lines and Trek-ideology, all that jazz. I have never been a Star Trek fan or a collector of sports cards, but I did have an interest in old comics and movies. Other than my aversion to Star Trek and sports cards -- I confess I was still a little rattled that my interests were otherwise very much aligned with others at Comic-Con -- who seemed geeky in appearance and manner, very intellectual and socially awkward if they had to talk about unrelated subjects like their jobs or what was in the news. I seemed to need reassurance because I asked my girlfriend (who went only because of my interest, not hers) -- "do I seem that way to you?" And she said no. More than 30 years later, she remains above my standing, not what people expect; I obviously got lucky because I'm not an attractive match for her and I'm not rich. ** But what was funny, I'll never forget this -- one year we went to Comic-Con to buy more comics and folded one-sheets -- and this guy, he looked like the square dude who plays the NBC page on "30 Rock" -- kept following my then girlfriend around whenver I strayed into another direction in the dealer's room, peppering her with questions -- and I overheard this Boy Scout trying to pick her up, asking for her phone number. I guess he was surprised to see a girl like her at Comic-Con. (She worked at JC Penney at the time and eventually became a department manager at Nordstrom.) My then girlfriend politely declined to give out her personal information and then she swiveled and gave me a glare that said, "get me outta of this place, NOW." ** Today, Comic-Con is gigantic, with crowds of around 100,000 or more held at the huge San Diego Convention Center on the harbor -- and though the event still retains its geek factor -- it's far more inclusive, with tons of stuff for children and movie-related material and events going constantly. When Comic-Con started, its only attendees were young adults and grumpy old men. The trouble today is few can afford to attend Comic-Con. And I understand that this year's bash is already sold out. In terms of its impact on traffic and people crowding our streets -- Comic-Con is bigger than the Super Bowls our city has hosted. Every Comic-Con, locals avoid downtown. But now that we have a major league baseball stadium downtown, it's a nightmare. -d. -----Original Message----- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:13:34 -0700 From: aday_5...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Speaking of Stephen Fishler... To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Guilty on all counts (btw ... I finally got the beautiful woman, but she was born waaaay after ST left the airwaves). ad --- On Sun, 3/15/09, David Kusumoto <davidmkusum...@hotmail.com> wrote: From: David Kusumoto <davidmkusum...@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [MOPO] Speaking of Stephen Fishler... To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 2:46 AM (truncated) And we used to laugh because at lunch he would tell us off and on that any woman he might marry in the future -- MUST first know all about Star Trek and understand it. And oh, of course, that woman would have to be gorgeous. He didn't collect movie posters, but he DID collect comics and action figures. I bet if I drew a line connecting all of MoPo's members -- that I would find (besides a shared interest in posters) -- a past or present interest in comics, sports cards and sci-fi/sorcery stuff. -d. -----Original Message----- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:46:19 -0700 From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Speaking of Stephen Fishler... To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU ** I saw Fishler in person that one and only time -- and he struck me then as a very quiet but intense young man, almost trying to hide from any attention. When I tried to interview him, he was visibly uncomfortable and gave me only a few one-breath quotes. But everyone in the huge room was curious about him. "Who's the kid with all the money who looks like he just got out of high school?," was the general buzz. Instead of letting someone else bid on his behalf, Stephen flew from NY to L.A. to bid in person. That was a helluva sale -- and it was striking in that you got the feeling that Stephen himself knew he was not going to lose those two Universal horror posters; he had no limit. It happened at Bruce's first stand-alone showroom sale (Dec. 1998) -- after directing Christie's previous poster sales in New York. Fishler struck me as a very mysterious figure. Since then, I've seen him quoted many times and have learned that he has ALWAYS been a big name in the comic book world. ** My wife and I have always found it intriguing that so many movie poster collectors are hyper-intellectual guys who used to collect sports cards or comic books, who love sci-fi and Star Trek -- who have a high-geek factor that people (esp. women) can instantly spot in a crowd. For example, the character "Dwight" in NBC's "The Office" -- played by the hilarious Rainn Wilson -- is the sort of guy you'd expect to collect comics and posters, a guy who treats the Lord of the Rings or Star Trek-type universes like a religion. And so he does. ** There used to be this quiet, portly guy in his 30s who was a graphic designer in our office in San Diego. And we used to laugh because at lunch he would tell us that any woman he might marry in the future -- MUST first know all about Star Trek and understand it.. And oh, of course, that woman would have to be gorgeous. He didn't collect movie posters, but he DID collect comics and action figures. I bet if I drew a line connecting all of MoPo's members -- that I would find (besides a shared interest in posters) -- a past or present interest in comics, sports cards and sci-fi/sorcery stuff. Speaking for myself, I was real INTO comic books during the first 5-6 years of Comic-Con before moving on to books and movies big-time. -d. -----Original Message----- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:36:24 -0700 To: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com; MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU From: sa...@comic-art.com Subject: Re: [MOPO] Speaking of Stephen Fishler... David first time I met Steve he was 12 years old looking for Fantastic Four #1 and had the cash with him and much more. a year later he was a dealer too. Always a good friend, I know he won't be bothered by mentioning that his father was a liquor distributor and that should tell you everything. His mother is a sweet lady and Steve is a very smart businessman Rich At 04:28 PM 3/14/2009, David Kusumoto wrote: On the AP wires today, see below. [BTW, Fishler was/is a big buyer of movie posters and is loaded with $$$. I saw him at Bruce's huge auction held in L.A.'s cavernous Pacific Design Center that I covered 10 years ago for Movie Collector's World. At the time he was only 31 -- and he walked away with the biggest prizes of the day -- two unbacked one-sheets for "Dracula" ($74,750) and "The Invisible Man" ($55,200).] -d. ---------------------- Rare Superman comic sells for $317,200 Mar 14, 5:44 PM (ET) By DAVID B. CARUSO NEW YORK (AP) - A rare copy of the first comic book featuring Superman has sold for $317,200 in an Internet auction. The previous owner had bought it for less than a buck. It's one of the highest prices ever paid for a comic book, a likely testament to the volume's rarity and its excellent condition, said Stephen Fishler, co-owner of the auction site ComicConnect.com and its sister dealership, Metropolis Collectibles. The winning bid for the 1938 edition of Action Comics No. 1, which features Superman lifting a car on its cover, was submitted Friday evening by John Dolmayan, drummer for the rock band System of a Down, according to managers at ComicConnect.com. Dolmayan, who is also a dealer of rare comic books, said he acquired the Superman comic on behalf of a client he declined to identify. "This is one of the premier books you could collect," he said in a telephone interview. "It's considered the Holy Grail of comic books. I talked to my client, and we made the move." Dolmayan said the client has "a small collection, but everything he has is incredible." Only about 100 copies of Action Comics No. 1 are known to exist and they seldom come up for sale. "Maybe in a booming economy, it would have done a hundred grand more, but in this economy, I think the price is great," Fishler said. The man who had previously owned the book purchased it in a secondhand store in the early 1950s when he was nine years old. He paid 35 cents. --- Associated Press writer Adam Goldman in New York contributed to this report. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
