Here Here !!!

I agree 100%

jim

 

  Check out our shop video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-n2AznLA8o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCP7PaO-2tk
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCP7PaO-2tk&feature=related>
&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fojAZcbvL7E
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fojAZcbvL7E&feature=related>
&feature=related


jim episale
Unshredded Nostalgia
323 South main St. Route 9
Barnegat, N.J. 08005
800-872-9990 609-660-2626

"Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional."

From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Anne Coco
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 3:59 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: [MOPO] the role of restoration in forgeries

 

I have been reading the discussion surrounding the recent revelations about
forgeries have been discussed and there is one point I would like to make
before this topic is sidelined as old news.  The over-restoration of movie
posters has contributed greatly to forgers' ability to fake old paper.  Too
much paint makes it difficult to determine not only how much (if any)
original paper actually exists but it also plays into the hands of those
with nefarious plans.  As I understand it, the forgers not only distressed
the paper that they used but they also applied over-painting because this is
a common practice within the field of collectible movie paper.  I would
advocate for movie paper collectibles to instead be evaluated based on their
original condition not some ideal that can be created via the application of
over-painting.  

 

If anything good comes out of this, it would be (in my opinion) that
collectors would look at posters with fold creases and paper losses and
learn to love them just the way they are without paint to brighten the
colors and obscure the signs of use.  If the practice of over-painting could
magically disappear, it would be much easier to determine what is and is not
real.  Visible fold creases should be viewed as a clue that the paper is
truly what it claims to be while a lack of fold creases should be a cause of
concern for collectors.  If the fold creases, background and borders have
been over-painted, how can you be certain that what you are buying is more
paper than paint?  And I haven't even touched on the problems of what
happens to paint and paper when they age.  It's not pretty, especially if
the piece was exhibited under less than ideal light conditions in a frame on
a wall in your house for a long period of time.

 

That said I completely understand that paper losses particularly in the
image area can detract greatly from the enjoyment of a poster.  In these
cases, those in the field of paper conservation would tell you that whatever
you do should be completely reversible serving only to trick the eye at a
distance but completely revealing itself upon close inspection.

 

Whether you collect for personal enjoyment, as an investment or as part of a
larger institutional mandate, the posters we all hold are part of our larger
cultural heritage as well as assets to be protected.  Please take my
comments as an attempt to ask the field to re-evaluate current practices and
think about the long-term implications of over-restoration.  The benefit
will be increased transparency which will make it more difficult for forgers
to ply their trade and collections that will continue to awe for generations
to come.

 

 

Anne Coco

Graphic Arts Librarian

 

Search our catalog!

http://catalog.oscars.org

 

 

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to